So in this episode, I’d like to address a common question I receive in my inbox with listeners because I’m tired of having to answer it every time it comes up individually.
That way, if any of my listeners encounter this particular challenge to how nature intended society and people to function, they can point others to this episode for some much-needed education on the subject.
Now, the wording varies and somewhat depends on if a woman or man is asking it, but all it really boils down to is: what do we do with homosexuals?
This is complicated, but it shouldn’t be.
My research on this subject is quite extensive and well-rounded, and one thing is clear like a shining beacon across the spectrum of academic studies on homosexuality: it has sharply risen in recent decades.
Don’t believe me? Feel free to do your own research if you have doubts. The great thing about this claim is that it’s not just supported by the findings of one side. Even liberal academics can’t deny that homosexuality is a mostly modern phenomenon.
That’s not to say homosexuals haven’t always existed - unfortunately, they have always been around. It’s no different than any other mental illness in that sense. The world has always had its share of crazies. But homosexuality and so called transgenderism show a sharp increase in the past three decades, which I find both troubling and telling.
First of all, why would there suddenly be a spike in homosexuality?
People like to criticize this question itself, but we would not do that if the mental illness in question replaced homosexuality with something like Schizophrenia, would we?
To even tackle this question, we must re-frame gays and lesbians as mentally ill people.
That’s what homosexuality is.
When people demand proof of that, I almost want to laugh.
First off, the goal of any species is to reproduce. Homosexuality actively goes against reproduction.
That makes it a fundamental flaw, not a choice or so-called “orientation.”
It is neither.
It is a mental illness and belongs firmly in that group.
That leads us to the next obvious question: is there a way to treat it effectively or cure it?
The answer depends largely on whether the homosexual in question is a man or woman.
In the case of women, it’s much more treatable.
With women, it’s easy to remove any homosexual desires with humane and surgical removal of the clitoris.
And before you all start accusing me of female genital mutilation, I want to be very clear about why what I propose is NOT that.
I don’t advocate for holding women down while fully conscious and using crude tools to mutilate; I believe this should be done in a medical setting and under sedation.
Westerners love to demonize cultures that practice some form of clitoral removal, but have any of them ever stopped to investigate the potential benefits once the method has been made humane?
I mean, consider that countries all over Asia and Africa, as well as the Middle East, engage in this practice. That’s a lot of the world.
Could it be that we are the one that’s wrong here?
Let’s discuss for a moment the bigger picture.
Female circumcision, as it’s normally called, is very effective at preventing homosexuality in females.
It removes the mechanism for sexual pleasure and orgasm in women who are sexually deviant and don’t want sex with men.
But the clitoris also creates a lot of problems for “normal” women who are in relationships with men.
Once a woman has had too much sexual pleasure (or, in other words, has engaged with the clitoris more than is healthy) her expectations of pleasure can be reset and made unrealistic.
Think of the clitoris as an evolutionary flaw that hasn’t been fixed yet - it’s actually a leftover of male tissue that isn’t eliminated once a fetus becomes female. I belive that eventually, evolution will phase this out and women will not have them anymore.
But in the meantime, it can be dangerous and confusing for women to recklessly indulge in something they should not be experiencing.
Lesbian sex is not possible without the clitoris.
Even straight women are better wives without one.
There is a strong argument to be made for clitoral removal for all women.
In fact, make it clear before marrying a woman that you expect her to give hers up.
It’s the ultimate expression of submission to a man, and it makes life simpler and better for both men and women.
It also makes her less likely to cheat on her husband or engage in other deviant sexual behavior like masturbation, watching porn, etc.
No clitoris —> no mechanism for lesbian sex —> mental illness effectively treated.
I’m tempted to declare it cured, but some mentally ill women may continue to think they are sexually attracted to other women. However, as long as they are being put to use by a man then this becomes irrelevant.
What they feel doesn’t matter.
Now, when the homosexuals are men, this is much more difficult.
You cannot simply remove a part of a man’s body that he doesn’t need in order to cure him of this disease. Obviously removing his testicles or penis would be both gruesome and inhumane.
It would also compromise his ability to breed.
Societies have tried all kinds of different approaches for curing male homosexuality over the ages, but none have produced very promising results.
The most effective thing that every person can start immediately doing to help these people conform, rather than change, is to react with the appropriate disgust to homosexuality. By shaming these men from all directions, we can socially pressure them into at least living in an acceptable way.
In other words, we can shame them into conforming enough that they will still marry, have children, and live outwardly normal lives. Yes, they will still lurk around in pursuit of sex with other men. In a way, they can’t help themselves. Remember, they have a disease and this is a symptom.
But I feel like as long as men are acting like men, living like men, we can all just look the other way when they have an occasional weakness and act in sexually deviant ways.